The Defend the Dunes Trust
Revised Estimates of
Return Levels and Return Periods at St. Annes and their relevance to the Blackburn
Children’s Home site.
This assessment of sea level returns and return periods is based on the
following background information:-
The principal
factors affecting astronomical tides levels are relatively short term so that
at any particular coastal position the tidal ranges and frequency of high tides
observed in any one year are a fairly good measure of the frequencies for all
years. Minor influences superimposed on
the major factors result in the very highest tides that return every 18 years,
1997, 2015, etc.
Reed’s Nautical
Almanac (1) shows the astronomical mean high water levels are the
same for Liverpool, Preston, Fleetwood and Heysham, therefore the tide levels
at Liverpool also apply along the Fylde Coast.
The Proudman
Oceanographic Laboratory estimates the increase in sea level along the Lancashire
Coast arising from global warming, etc. is about 8 mm/year. (2)
The Proudman
Oceanographic Laboratory has studied the surges in sea level as a result of
meteorological factors for the British Isles, including those at Heysham, the
nearest available data collection point to the Fylde Coast.(3) Nearly all large sea level surges were
observed to occur in the 8 winter
months. Over the 21 years of
measurement the maximum surge was +2.7 m. and about 25 surges of 1.7 m or more
were recorded. The most satisfactory
method of estimating future flooding return levels and return periods from the
available data was found to be the Revised Joint Probabilities Method (RJPM).
A surge of about
2.3 m is reported for the Fylde Coast in 1977 with additional wave heights of
from 1.5 to 3 m depending on beach characteristics.(4)
The standard
atmospheric pressure used to compute tide tables is 1028 mbar and under severe
storm conditions the atmospheric pressure may fall to about 950 mbar,
therefore, based on the American Practical Navigator, (5) the drop in atmospheric pressure alone can
cause elevations of sea level of up to about 0.7 m.
On the basis that surges along the Lancashire Coast can reach 2.7 m and
that low atmospheric pressure alone can result in a surge of 0.7 m a 1.7 m
surge is considered to be a reasonably conservative level to assume for
forecasting for the Fylde Coast under severe storm conditions. Applying this surge value to three typical
higher tide heights the following annual probabilities of sea level returns
were derived from the tidal predictions for Liverpool for 2002 & 2003. (6
)
Tide height Sea level Adjusted % of days in the 8
mACD mAOD* mAOD** winter months
2002 2003 Mean
9.0 4.1 6.2 43.3 45.4 44
9.5
4.6 6.7 17.9
20.4 19
9.9
5.0 7.1 7.1 12.9 10
* Chart Datum - 4.9 = Ordnance Datum in metres
(6)
** Adjusted for global
warming to 2050 and with 1.7 m surge added.
Assuming that there are on average two significant storms per year
during the 8 winter months (for example from observations carried out by the
Defend the Dunes Trust there were two in the early months of 2002) and that on average one storm in ten can
give a large surge (based on the fact that the prevailing winds in the area are
southwesterly and this is also the direction of maximum fetch) then the
probability of a tide of 9.0 m coinciding with low atmospheric pressure, a
storm and a surge of 1.7 m is 0.44 x 2
x 0.1 = 0.09,which gives a return period of 11 years.
The results for the same three typical return levels are:-
Adjusted % of days in
Return period
mAOD** winter months
(years)
6.2 44 11
6.7 19 26
7.1 10 50
In the attached Figure these estimates are compared with POL RJPM data for Heysham (adjusted for global warming to 2050) and
with the Environment Agency estimate of a flooding risk of one in 200 y
with a return level of 6.2 mAOD (7) (in this case adjusted for
global warming using EA estimate of trend in sea levels of 0.4 mm/y). It is clear from this that the estimates of
predicted sea levels presented here compare well with those of POL but that the
EA data point does not. Even applying
the higher estimates for sea level rise to the EA data still gives a much lower
estimate of flooding risk.
It is noteworthy that POL (3) emphasise the value of using longer term historical data to
improve the accuracy of the results. Local records of flooding obtained from
local newspaper and other reports indicates that sea flooding has occurred on
several occasions along the Fylde Coast since 1821. In particular, more recent data indicate that coastal flooding
has occurred at sites with comparable geography to the St. Annes dunes in 1896,
1903, 1907, 1927, and 1977, i.e. 5 times in 108 years. (8) Thus
historical records of flooding are in
good agreement with the POL results and with those developed here. In addition it must be remembered that these
estimates of sea levels take no account of the superimposed height of waves which
must be expected under storm conditions and these are reported to have been up
to 1.5 m for more gently shelving beaches, as is the case at St. Annes. (4)
The POL data and our own predictions make it clear that flooding is a
serious risk (1 in 50 year return with a sea level of 7.1 mAOD) at the Blackburn
Home site where parts of the slab level are at 6.4 mAOD. (9) As noted elsewhere (8) flooding
has not been reported in the past at Blackburn Children’s Home but the nearby
cutting has been made through the dunes since the last serious flood in 1977 and
it has a low sill. We suggest that flooding
could arise from sea water coming through that nearby cutting, over Clifton Drive
North (height 6 mAOD) and onto the site, or in the case of a more persistant
storm from catastrophic failure of the line dunes. It may be argued that should a high sea level
be anticipated this cutting could be blocked but analysis of the last severe floods
(4) makes it clear that the emergency services would be at full stretch
under very severe storm conditions. Furthermore, the scale of damage inflicted
on sections of the sand dunes on 1st Feb. 2002 under modest storm and tidal conditions
of only short duration(8) shows the scale of defences necessary.

D
A Moore
29th
December 2002
REFERENCES
1.
Reed’s
Nautical Almanac, 2003, MacMillan Press.
2.
Proudman
Oceanographic Laboratory Internal Document No. 140, 2001
3.
Proudman
Oceanographic Laboratory Internal Document No. 64, 1994
4.
Notes
on a MAFF Meeting of Regional Land Drainage Chairmen Report, 3rd May 1978.
5.
American
Handbook of Navigation, by Bowditch.
6.
Liverpool
Tide Table 2002 & 2003, Laver Publishing Co.
7.
Environment
Agency, Flood Plain Maps, January 2002.
8.
An
assessment of the Risk of Flooding.....
Defend the Dunes Report, May 2002
9.
Assessment
flood risk at the Blackburn Children’s Home site, Parkman Ltd, March 2002.